Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Education

How Expanding Prison Education Funding Reduces Recidivism

One of the many consequences of the tough on crime era has been continuous cuts to prison education funding, which has furthered the cycle of mass incarceration and will continue to do so until federal and state governments reverse the trend.

What we know

We know that a lack of education is one of the things that leads people into incarceration. We know that illiteracy also lands people in prison and restricts their opportunities once they get out. We can say with certainty, based on numerous studies, that offering some form of education, whether it be high school and GED classes, vocational programs or college courses, can have a huge impact on people once they are released.

But despite the fact that prison reformists and researchers know that education in prison helps, the programs continue to lack the funding needed to make education available to all prisoners who need it. It’s time we talk about why.

State budget cuts have made prison education a victim

When it comes to corrections, every state has a different budget and a different system, and states have discretion to cut funding when deemed necessary. Unfortunately, as state corrections budgets have been cut in the past decade, there has been a trend of reducing prison education programs as a result.

In 2009, when California’s corrections budget was reduced by a whopping $1.2 billion, the state opted to cut their corrections education by 30 percent to balance out the budget. In 2011, Texas dropped its corrections education budget by around 27 percent.

These types of cuts have had staggering consequences on the effectiveness of educational programs for inmates. California’s cuts resulted in the loss of 712 teachers, half of their vocational programs, and thousands of slots in all of their programs. Texas lost 271 teachers, cut everyone’s salaries and stopped being able to provide educational supplies.

National trends have supported state efforts to cut prison education

States may vary wildly in how they fund education in prison, but national policy changes in the past two decades have also dictated noticeable trends in correctional education spending.

The tough-on-crime era in the 1980s and ‘90s changed the way that we think about crime and put an emphasis on punishment over rehabilitation. Unfortunately, one of the big victims of this era was educational programs in prison.

[postquote]

In 1994, under the Clinton presidency and at the height of the tough-on-crime frenzy, Congress banned inmates from receiving federal Pell Grants to fund their education. In 1998, the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) cut funding for correctional education to a maximum of 10 percent, where before it had been a minimum.

These two changes set guidelines for state correctional spending and helped pave the way for states to cut their educational programs as a way to balance their budgets.

Recent changes for the better

The tough on crime era and recent budget cuts may have set correctional budgets back, but there are some recent policy changes, programs and initiatives that indicate a growing awareness of the necessity of prison education.

In 2008, the Second Chance Act established a series of grants for state programs that improve outlooks for inmates after release. SCA has set up grants across 49 states in different areas of education, career training and treatment.

Meanwhile, in 2015 the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act modified the changes by the WIA by capping correctional education spending at 20 percent instead of 10, and qualifying additional educational programs for funding.

And in 2016, the Obama Administration announced the launch of a renewed Pell Grant program to reinstate the federal aid to eligible inmates.

Our take

There are so many inmates wanting to pursue education during their incarceration who are not able to because of a lack of funding. Since we know that this education can have a hugely positive impact on their post-release outcomes, these programs need to be funded more instead of continuously being cut to balance budgets.

In order for states to stop reducing correctional education in response to the cuts they face, there needs to be more federal standards regarding correctional education funding.

 

Have something to add to this story? Comment below or join the discussion on Facebook.

Header image: Adobestock

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 hours ago
The Meaning Behind Juneteenth

@shaysayss breaks down the history and significance behind Juneteenth.
https://t.co/WQNvjUsfS8
13 hours ago
4 Last-Minute Father’s Day Gift Ideas That Say I Love You, Dad! - https://t.co/8e6eNbtECX

You May Also Like

Business

What is the gap between culture and technology? According to Damas, entertainers have passions that brands and companies may not be aware of, and...

2016 president election

In a political climate dominated by a two-party system, Libertarians are constantly confused as off-brand Republicans. Although the two groups sometimes align on issues,...

Entrepreneurship

And the winner is (drumroll please): Holland, Michigan! Never heard of it? Well, it’s a four-hour drive from Milwaukee, and it is populated by...

economy

If you didn’t notice the upward momentum of electric vehicle (EV) stocks in the latter half of 2020, you haven’t been paying attention. More...

Copyright © 2020 GenBiz. GenBiz is owned and operated by GenBiz Inc. a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.